Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by junon on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @08:58AM
(#29093950)
Bad faith arguments are discouraged on HN.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by Ensorceled on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @09:06AM
(#29094045)
It's sarcasm, not bad faith.
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by spacemanmatt on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @09:10AM
(#29094076)
Please remember Poe's law, and how constantly applicable it is here
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by Ensorceled on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @09:12AM
(#29094105)
Sigh. I mean, I thought I was way outside the realm of Poe's law with that one ... guess not.
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by throwawayswede on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @09:05AM
(#29094029)
So should be quoting HN rules without explaining exactly and very specifically how and what you're referencing applies.
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by junon on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @09:15AM
(#29094138)
"Bad faith" is pretty self-explanatory, is it not? Of course it was sarcasm, the point being made is a bad faith assumption of the GP's point.
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by throwawayswede on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @10:50AM
(#29095481)
The point is not in explaining "bad faith", but in explaining how and why the comment you're replying to is "bad faith". Was not clear to me at all that you were being sarcastic.
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by junon on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @11:01AM
(#29095639)
We're running in circles a bit here but the author of the comment I responded to claimed in a followup comment that it was sarcasm. Sarcasm and bad/good faith discussion are mutually exclusive.
Re:Ban Pay to View Content on Hacker News?
by throwawayswede on Wednesday November 03, 2021 @11:36AM
(#29096125)
Inception level guessing and assumptions you're making all in this thread.