If Mozilla doesn't track with this ad, I'm _okay_ with it.
Why not?
Benefit: Removing ads isn't much of a benefit for me, since having tracking protection and first party isolation.
Cost: Ads blocker require high privilege permissions that I choose not to grant.
Why not? I'm genuinely curious... The web feels completely different without ad blockers, at least to me.
> Ads blocker require high privilege permissions that I choose not to grant.
That is perfectly understandable. I agree with you. I think these blockers should be built into the browser themselves in order to eliminate this problem. Sadly, conflicts of interest prevent that. Firefox is funded by Google.
To clarify, I prefer an ad-free browsing experience.
However, I haven't seen an alternative to ads that works for adequately funding content on the /open/ web.
I like that most journalism, YouTube, and social media are free for all.
YES. How can Mozilla be so out of touch? Do they not understand the fact people use their browser because it supports uBlock Origin? We need to repeat this loud and clear until they get it.