Having spoken to someone involved in the investigation, it really did happen but like anything this politically sensitive it was quickly hushed up to avoid making it more of a diplomatic incident. The AU had tried to prevent the news from leaking in the first place.
That's quite typical for espionage, where unless there's a desire to publicly burn a few bridges countries would rather have it handled quietly through regular diplomatic channels.
Generally, trusting Western media on Africa reporting is never a good idea. But at the end of the day, this, and Snowden's revelations show - if you don't make it, then you don't own it.
[0] https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2018/01/26/a-addis-ab...
According to the person I spoke to on the team that responded, and helped set up the new replacement system and network, there had been warnings for years about the adoption of the system and the lack of any real monitoring, but those were ignored because it was considered politically sensitive to double-check on what the Chinese had provided.
It was a new member of staff who did their own experimentation without authorisation who found it and sent it up the chain, to point where it couldn’t be ignored or hidden anymore. Mostly because that made the delegations aware of how terrible security was, whereas before it seems they’d assumed the organisation had that covered.
There are 1000 different ways they could have done it.
I too would be interested in hearing more though.
Free software might be an exception, but free hardware equipment really sounds suspicious.
We hear that the device was sending uploads to China in the middle of the night. But what type of uploads? And was it firmware based, or OS based? That whole Hussein(-Addis affair just seems very suspect to me.