Re:Sustainable Energy without the Hot Air (Revised, Communit...
by pfdietz on Sunday October 31, 2021 @07:37PM
(#29061526)
Which means that nuclear proponents should use the cost of breeder reactors with reprocessing, not burner reactors with a once-through fuel cycle, when calculating the cost of nuclear energy. This will likely increase the cost of energy from nuclear.
Re:Sustainable Energy without the Hot Air (Revised, Communit...
by KennyBlanken on Monday November 01, 2021 @02:28AM
(#29063609)
If we forced them to be honest we'd also force them to account for the huge carbon sink the plant represents until it has generated enough power to offset its construction footprint.
We need solutions that pay back as fast as possible, not stuff that will go neutral in 20 years.
Re:Sustainable Energy without the Hot Air (Revised, Communit...
by acidburnNSA on Sunday October 31, 2021 @10:55PM
(#29062626)
I don't really know about that. After we have 1000 GW scale lwrs the prices of reprocessing might be different than today's prices.
[1] https://whatisnuclear.com/blog/2020-10-28-nuclear-energy-is-...
The same point was made in the Hot Air book as well [2]
[2] https://www.withouthotair.com/c24/page_162.shtml
Since this is roughly the remaining lifetime of the Sun, there's a very strong argument to consider nuclear fission breeder reactors just as renewable as the solar-derived energies (wind, solar, hydro, biofuel)