News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected. Parent comment

Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by pelasaco on Sunday October 31, 2021 @04:56PM (#29060345)
Our lifestyle is sustainable. It just doesn't scale for 10 billion people. The only problem what we have is the amount of people. We can do something against it, but we won't.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by Oddskar on Monday November 01, 2021 @11:25AM (#29067929)
Why can't it be both?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by pelasaco on Monday November 01, 2021 @12:02PM (#29068575)
what both? Any existing prediction says that the Earth won't support more than 10 billion people. Our life is much more "sustainable" now than before. Yes we still have a lot to do, we will always have, but gosh, we are simply too many. I can't believe in a COPXX if birth control isn't part of the solution.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by Oddskar on Monday November 01, 2021 @02:34PM (#29070917)
Both population control and a sustainable lifestyle.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected by pelasaco on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @04:27PM (#29086929)
you are right. Was Population control a topic on COP26? Is population control a topic when we talk about CO2 emission?
[ Parent | on HN ]