Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected
by nitrogen on Sunday October 31, 2021 @01:02PM
(#29058394)
Not for eight billion people. Just look at what happens when we stop loading trucks for a little while. Now imagine if you expanded all that "going without" to everything that uses energy. You'd have days at most before mass chaos.
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected
by Goety on Sunday October 31, 2021 @04:48PM
(#29060274)
Can we engineer a human backbone behind these services to be resistant to corruption and complacency for security sake?
We did an ok job with nuclear weapons but only just.
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected
by enaaem on Sunday October 31, 2021 @05:57PM
(#29060841)
Before electricity we would burn wood to not die in winter. We don’t have any forests left to do that.
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected
by adrianN on Monday November 01, 2021 @01:42PM
(#29070156)
Luckily nowadays we have clean sources of energy, so there is no need to go back to burning wood.
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected
by varajelle on Sunday October 31, 2021 @03:16PM
(#29059505)
In what condition? Without the energy of the fossil fuel, lots of the energy came from human labor. Without it, we wouldn't have gotten rid of slavery. Most people were doing a manual labor, which is also more discriminatory to the weaker ones (e.g. woman)
So your just suggesting we go back to the middle ages? No, thank you.
Re:All Applications for Nuclear Energy at COP26 Rejected
by Goety on Sunday October 31, 2021 @04:10PM
(#29059952)
>In what condition?
Well that's the question right? Without nuclear there may not be a middle ground as an option for a lot of people.
>So your just suggesting we go back to the middle ages? No, thank you.
I'm not suggesting anything, simply declaring it an option.
Energy is needed for basic modern services.
Humans have survived a long time without electricity. It could be simpler to 'go without' or 'find a workaround' for a lot of conveniences if we were serious at combating climate change.