Re:A 29-year-oldused a weird resume to get 30k interviews in...
by vesuvianvenus on Sunday October 31, 2021 @09:46AM
(#29056934)
Note the difference between the below two items:
1. Title:
A 29-year-old marketing expert used a weird resume to ___get 30,000 interviews___ in a week
2. A subheader bullet point:
Vidal's bot was used 30,000 times, and he ___got 14 online interviews___ and 11 job offers as a result.
Does 30,000 somehow equal 14?
(Answer: only if you equate 30,000 self-service chatbot conversations ("interviews" as claimed) as as meaningful and valuable as an actual human-to-human interview. Basically, this article has a deceptive clickbaity title.)
(I emailed BusinessInsider's corrections account about this.
[email protected])
1. Title: A 29-year-old marketing expert used a weird resume to ___get 30,000 interviews___ in a week
2. A subheader bullet point: Vidal's bot was used 30,000 times, and he ___got 14 online interviews___ and 11 job offers as a result.
Does 30,000 somehow equal 14?
(Answer: only if you equate 30,000 self-service chatbot conversations ("interviews" as claimed) as as meaningful and valuable as an actual human-to-human interview. Basically, this article has a deceptive clickbaity title.)
(I emailed BusinessInsider's corrections account about this. [email protected])