Re:Scientists recreated classic origin-of-life experiment an...
by pfdietz on Saturday October 30, 2021 @08:52AM
(#29048385)
The meaning is clear in context. Try reading what I wrote in good faith rather than searching for a gotcha.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Scientists recreated classic origin-of-life experiment an...
by sophacles on Saturday October 30, 2021 @11:57AM
(#29049780)
If you don't like me repeating your words to you, maybe you should look in a mirror and slap yourself?
Re:Scientists recreated classic origin-of-life experiment an...
by pfdietz on Tuesday November 02, 2021 @07:13AM
(#29079554)
Ok, I will spell it out.
"Exponentially small" here means "the probability could be ~ e^-n" where n is a number proportional to the complexity of the minimal evolving system. This would happen if there's some gap that has to be bridged by random chance before we get a system capable of sustaining natural selection.
The point here is that this could easily be vastly smaller than 1/N, where N is (say) the number of atoms in the universe x age of the universe x rate at which atoms might interact to form such systems.
I think you could have easily understood this point if you had made an effort to do so, without me having to spoonfeed it to you here.