At its core, creating a closed system for an open community is destructive. Even the fact that a "blurred" frequently used concept - meta - is chosen does not make him a leader. It seems to me that Mark missed this time.

In 2017, I analyzed a lot of startups based on blockchain technologies. I saw that most of them publicly declare decentralization, in fact leaving the management of the "main algorithm" to the owner of the idea. This is inadequate to the existing demand of a free society!