Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos...
by loudtieblahblah on Monday November 01, 2021 @07:55AM
(#29065539)
You're making the argument against free speech, no matter the subject. You realize that, right?
And if only "experts" are allowed speech, then how do we qualify an expert? Bc if we go by the last 2 years we're not even allowing public debate amongst medical experts, intellectuals or even the person who helped invent an mrna vaccine without gross censorship.
Experts has come to mean government appointments and government agencies,which makes them all potentially influenced by political pressures.
So the only "valid" opinions have obvious flaws and no one else, regardless of qualifications is allowed to speak up.
Bc medical experts and scientists not deemed as part of the agenda get derided as "the average person" bc they dared to have wrongthink.
Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos...
by iszomer on Friday October 29, 2021 @04:01PM
(#29042918)
The legitimacy process of peer review may also be called into question in reference to the recent joint works done by James Lindsay, Peter Boghossian, and Helen Pluckrose. And they aren't even "right-wing" though the mainstream portrays them to be.
Re:Effect of early treatment with fluvoxamine on risk of hos...
by loudtieblahblah on Monday November 01, 2021 @07:56AM
(#29065547)
James has been red pilled. Heather and Peter not so much
You give the average person the ability to do "research" and they are killing themselves because people fall for all kinds of bullshit. Cults exist. Scam artists are a dime a dozen.
This stuff gets associated with trump and the right because they associate themselves wth it. I don't vote Democratic, I just don't think you're being realistic about how people operate, regardless whether I beleive that "censorship" is the answer or not.