Re:Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm
by coding123 on Friday October 29, 2021 @02:15PM
(#29041770)
I'm not the guy you contacted, but I've had my head down in Title 24 crap for months, but here's the egress requirements in CA:
https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CFC2019P4/chapter-10-means...
Read the section on "[BE] 1004.2Cumulative occupant loads."
----
> SBFire:
> Hi, I have a question I hope you can help me with. I
> stumbled across an article about the proposed UCSB "Munger
> Hall" on an Internet forum that I frequent.
> https://www.independent.com/2021/10/28/architect-resigns-in-...
> As a former firefighter myself, I got some serious bad
> vibes from the way this building was described. I made a
> comment about my concerns which sparked (no pun intended)
> a lot of discussion about fire safety, building codes,
> etc.
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29038356
> As it happens, the original article was somewhat light on
> details about the fire safety aspects of the building. So
> I wanted to reach out to you and simply ask "From an SB
> Fire perspective, has this building design been reviewed,
> and - if so - are there any outstanding concerns from a
> fire/life safety viewpoint?"
> I'm particularly interested in knowing if there are any
> concerns around the number of entrances / egress points,
> the proposal for interior bedrooms with no windows, and
> whether or not this structure would be sprinklered.
> Thank you kindly!