News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starship is still not understood by zardo on Thursday October 28, 2021 @02:53PM (#29029979)
> I really think this is overrated in how much of a technology risk this is. Specially if you have enough weight that you can invest in the solution.

Refueling is a schedule risk, maybe the first design will fail to account for something and it will take a couple iterations to get it right. There is zero risk that the problem is unsolvable.

Re:Starship is still not understood by panick21_ on Friday October 29, 2021 @03:43AM (#29036217)
I would agree mostly. If you need to many iterations you might run out of money however.

In general I think refueling is a far smaller problem then the heat shield.

Re:Starship is still not understood by zardo on Friday October 29, 2021 @02:24PM (#29041894)
The heat shield is such a massive component that it's conceivable that the first design is flawed, and resolving the flaw requires a dry mass increase that cuts into the payload and makes a Mars return unachievable.