News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Dune” (The Movie), Annotated by TeMPOraL on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @11:55AM (#29014970)
I mostly agree, except for "The Good Guys" part.

What I found endearing about the books[0] is that it didn't try to cast any of the factions as The Good Guys. The Foundation definitely isn't. The trilogy, especially the first book, shows the Foundation applying plenty of hard realpolitik to survive and expand; they do not carry any moral banner, except that of Seldon's Plan. They're not the United Federation of Planets by any measure. They just are. The Second Foundation isn't presented in a better light either.

> The anthropic principle is validated, and a single man did not in fact change history. This time.

I most likely haven't read far enough into the book sequence, but at least by "Foundation's Edge", the anthropic principle remains valid; the protagonist of that book, despite being seen as special by their contemporaries, still turns out to be involved in the story only because they happened to be best person available along the criteria of the ... entity ... driving the events.

--

[0] - That I've read so far, i.e. the trilogy, and "Foundation's Edge".

Re:“Dune” (The Movie), Annotated by spacedcowboy on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @12:01PM (#29015061)
> I mostly agree, except for "The Good Guys" part.

That's why I had "The Good Guys" in quotes :) We're supposed to root for the Foundation/Second Foundation, but it's clearly presented as the best of two evils. People, being people but better than 30,000 years of anarchy.