People confuse strong typing with static typing all the time. I guess this was the case here.
I did do that, I feel ashamed.
That's a good one. Brought a smile on my face.
From "What We Do In The Shadows": <https://youtu.be/yy4CN9DVPII?t=85>
Re:My ideal Rust workflow
by MrBuddyCasino on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @11:50AM
(#29014919)
Java IDEs let you evaluate random code fragments at runtime in the context of the current debugger stackframe. You can also change method bodies (not signatures) and have them hot-reload.
It might look like C++, but the JVM is really more like Smalltalk in nature.
Not really. SML and OCaml let you evaluate selected code snippets in REPL just fine, and their compilation is fast. I'm not sure about Haskell, but I'd guess it's similar with ghci.
"Strongly-typed" is in the eye of the beholder, but the phrase "compiled, strongly-typed programming languages" generally doesn't bring to my mind C++ and Java of which this statement would be more accurate.