News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google exec challenges Berners-Lee (2006) by bawolff on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @08:04PM (#29008040)
True, but i feel like central repos like wikidata are quite a bit different from the original vision of many small websites all interoperating into a semantic web.

Then again the same thing happened with the normal web. We have wikipedia instead of thousands of people writing articles on their personal homepages.

Re:Google exec challenges Berners-Lee (2006) by mulmen on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @10:15PM (#29008865)
But Wikipedia isn't a primary source and presumably it could (and does) link out to those personal sites.
Re:Google exec challenges Berners-Lee (2006) by teh_klev on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @07:20AM (#29011718)
Unfortunately you then run into "reliable sources" and "notability" battles with other wikipedians over citing personal websites.
Re:Google exec challenges Berners-Lee (2006) by bawolff on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @11:49PM (#29022178)
Re:Google exec challenges Berners-Lee (2006) by zozbot234 on Wednesday October 27, 2021 @03:19AM (#29010433)
> True, but i feel like central repos like wikidata are quite a bit different from the original vision of many small websites all interoperating into a semantic web.

One of the main roles for Wikidata is to act as a directory for these "many small websites" that enables them to interoperate seamlessly. You can look up a real-world entity on any website that Wikidata supports and use a third-party service ("Entity Explosion", see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Entity_Explosion ) to get links to the same entity as it appears on Wikidata and other sites.

Re:Google exec challenges Berners-Lee (2006) by wibagusto on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @09:34PM (#29008638)
What is IPFS though if not a glimpse of the future? Distributed makes more sense to me and P2P concepts are being heavily researched with all the blockchain hoo-ha!
Re:Google exec challenges Berners-Lee (2006) by bawolff on Tuesday October 26, 2021 @09:43PM (#29008677)
A proof-of-concept that's generated a lot of buzz but not a lot in terms of concrete or unique usage?