Why would police need grenades, of all things?
Does the US police use grenades?
> i can't think of a single high-profile police violence incident where the Gendermerie were involved.
Have the US police ever killed an unarmed protestor with their hands in the air using a grenade? From[1]:
> Statements from several eye witnesses show that Rémi, 21, had his hands in the air and was calling on gendarmes to stop firing when he was struck and killed by an offensive grenade. Their accounts also cast some doubts over the version of events given by the authorities about the student's death.
Perhaps you were just unaware.
[1] https://www.mediapart.fr/en/journal/france/270316/eco-protes...
Since they do the same work, do not share and duplicate the efforts it wild make sense to just merge them.
But that would require some people to let go kingdoms.
Having worked extensively with both, the way they are organized today is a pity.
Furthermore, i object to the claim that they are somehow an issue in policing. The article you've linked says just "police", so i doubt they're talking about the Carabinieri. In France, the Gendermerie ( countryside and small towns and cities) has a better reputation with regards to violence than the Police Nationale ( which only operate in cities); i can't think of a single high-profile police violence incident where the Gendermerie were involved. And when the Police Nationale were protesting due to overworking and unpaid overtime, the Gendermerie were the ones providing protection. Apparently the Spanish Guardia Civil also has a better reputation than regular Spanish police. In recent years the French army has started doing patrols in mainland France, among potentially high-profile targets ( airports, train stations, tourist hot spots)
So if anything, having two different branches of police seems beneficial in those specific cases.
And neither type of gendermerie has anything close to the equipment the US police has.