News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ivermectin shows that not all science is worth following. Parent comment

Re:Ivermectin shows that not all science is worth following by penultimatebro on Sunday October 24, 2021 @01:12PM (#28979880)
There you have it... if one dares to post anything that conflicts with the official narrative, you are a paid shill. Even if that post is literal science like the comment above which is a collection of studies on Ivermectin.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ivermectin shows that not all science is worth following by phonypc on Sunday October 24, 2021 @01:50PM (#28980273)
No, I'm (me, singular) close to assuming that people who link to an anonymous, mangled cherry-picking of incongruous study endpoints is a paid shill.
[ Parent | on HN ]