News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf]. Parent comment

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by jeffbee on Sunday October 24, 2021 @09:46AM (#28977837)
So it's not centralized at all in other words? Because it's an open standard that anyone can implement, both client and server, right?

100% totally decentralized.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by dmw_ng on Sunday October 24, 2021 @09:55AM (#28977911)
AMP requires you load all JS assets from cdnproject.org, which is owned by Google. It is as centralized as it comes
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by jeffbee on Sunday October 24, 2021 @10:06AM (#28978008)
AMP does not require any such thing. Anyone can implement the AMP cache, there are multiple existing AMP caches, and you can serve AMP without a cache, without in any way impairing the function of an AMP page.

https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/blob/main/docs/spec/am...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by dmw_ng on Sunday October 24, 2021 @10:14AM (#28978090)
https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/27546

Perhaps I'm wrong, but my interpretation of this ticket is that Google's AMP validator currently does not validate self-hosted JS, which means no special handling ("acceleration") on their search results.

[ Parent | on HN ]