News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by 1vuio0pswjnm7 on Sunday October 24, 2021 @05:04AM (#28976102)
In case anyone reading is unaware Google already inserts artificial delay into page loading times, to allow for header bidding. Online advertising proponents would argue this delay is below human perception. But the perceptibility of the wait should be for users, not Google, to decide; it is artifical and undisclosed delay, for the benefit of advertising. If users were told about it and could avoid it, no doubt they would. As we can see, artificial delay can be used as an anticompetitive measure.

These tactics, similar to deliberately introduced incompatibilities or performance differences, are old hat. For example, through the 90's, third party software for Windows never ran as smoothly as software issued by Microsoft. It was not the same "user experience". So long as this sort of conduct remains "legal", these companies interpret that as permission to engage in it.

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by tomjen3 on Sunday October 24, 2021 @05:14AM (#28976154)
So much software is too slow today. I don't think developers remember that users will not perceive your software as instant if you don't get the result in 100ms.

I cancelled my evernote subscription because it is too slow to start up. If I need to access a note on my phone, I don't want it to take perceived time, because then I have to go through the effort of remembering what I am trying to write.

I have switched to Apple notes, which seem to get this.

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by VRay on Sunday October 24, 2021 @07:46AM (#28977033)
At two large tech companies I worked for, people loved to throw around the term “blink of an eye!” to justify anything around 100ms

“Oh, that’ll load in the blink of an eye! Only as much latency as the blink of an eye!” etc

It was damn frustrating to try and explain to these clowns that things look like crap if you pile up 2+ blinks of an eye on top of them. In the case of VR, even one “blink of an eye” is about 10x too much delay

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by matheusmoreira on Sunday October 24, 2021 @07:08AM (#28976776)
> it is artifical and undisclosed delay, for the benefit of advertising

So ad blocking makes everything faster!

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by kbenson on Sunday October 24, 2021 @04:14PM (#28981448)
> Google already inserts artificial delay into page loading times, to allow for header bidding.

How does this allow for header bidding? Anything needed could be done in page or with a connection that delays the response until some condition is met.

The browser adding an artificial delay seems like it's just a way for the browser to control the process, and when the browser is controlled by an ad network, that makes me very suspicious as to the motives for an artificial delay.

Re:Google digital advertising antitrust litigation [pdf] by mthoms on Sunday October 24, 2021 @03:25PM (#28981075)
Is this delay on the HTML page being served? Or on the associated (ad-loading) scripts?