Everything in my comment except the shared bank account was reported before the election, with much of the specific content being suppressed or outright banned from multiple social media networks as part of coordinated enforcement action. The New York Post, a centuries-old newspaper that broke the story, was suspended from Twitter for multiple weeks due specifically to this reporting. Twitter could be forgiven for acting according to its “hacked materials policy” meant to protect innocent doxing victims like Hunter Biden, except for the fact that just weeks earlier they featured tweets from the New York Times that published illegally obtained private tax documents of the president (who was also later banned from Twitter).

I’m skeptical of the argument that recent vindication of a suppressed story somehow justifies its original suppression.

Bank account reporting:

https://news.yahoo.com/hot-water-emails-uncovered-show-10061...

The senate report has interesting stuff

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Rep...

There’s also that time biden got the prosecutor investigating burisma fired (by withholding funds).

https://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-joe-biden-forced-ukraine-t...

Seems an awful like what Trump was impeached for...

You clearly didn't read my comment. I specifically pointed out that the bank account story couldn't have been suppressed because it only came out recently.

I want you to repeat those words to yourself out loud: "the bank account story couldn't have been suppressed because it only came out recently"

Do it twice. It's okay, we'll wait.

There’s more evidence now, but in October 2020 you had these same emails released. The entire drive was available for anyone to download.

Further, an associate of the Biden family confirmed all the emails were real and he told the family not to take Chinese money.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who-is-tony-bobulinski-hunt...