Re:Kina Knowledge, using Common Lisp extensively in their do...
by math-dev on Saturday October 23, 2021 @02:45AM
(#28966288)
I’ve heard that. How do you find racket for speed and also interactive development?
I don’t mind a bit of scheme / racket, so would be curious to jump in.
Re:Kina Knowledge, using Common Lisp extensively in their do...
by Decabytes on Thursday October 28, 2021 @11:14PM
(#29034775)
My most recent example is a prime sieve I wrote in Racket which was at least 10% faster than the Python implementation (can’t remember the exact number right now) I modeled it after, and then another 10% faster than that when I converted it to typed-racket[1]
For interactive development it’s true Racket isn’t as heavy into top level development as other lisps, but I often run my code and then play around with modifications to it in the repo afterwards using racket-mode in Emacs.
[1] https://github.com/diego-crespo/Primes/blob/drag-race/PrimeR...
Re:Kina Knowledge, using Common Lisp extensively in their do...
by vindarel on Saturday October 23, 2021 @07:51AM
(#28967562)
Racket is not so interactive: https://gist.github.com/vindarel/c1ef5e043773921e3b11d8f4fe1...
1. https://docs.racket-lang.org/gui/
2. https://github.com/Metaxal/MrEd-Designer