Re:Trump's new platform and the Affero General Public Licens...
by throwawaysea on Friday October 22, 2021 @03:48PM
(#28961791)
I wasn’t aware that F-droid banned Gab. That is very disappointing. I am not sure why I need F-droid if they’re going to practice the same censorship and political bias that the walled gardens of big tech offers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Trump's new platform and the Affero General Public Licens...
by miloignis on Friday October 22, 2021 @03:56PM
(#28961900)
F-Droid allows you to add your own repositories! I think that's the best of both worlds - you're free to add whatever software sources you like, and F-Droid's not obligated to host content they disagree with, and it all works together nicely in one place.
Re:Trump's new platform and the Affero General Public Licens...
by kkjjkgjjgg on Friday October 22, 2021 @04:09PM
(#28962113)
What does that mean exactly? I could install F-Droid and add the Gab repository, and then install gab via that?
Re:Trump's new platform and the Affero General Public Licens...
by miloignis on Friday October 22, 2021 @04:23PM
(#28962267)
Yep, that's the idea! I don't know if Gab ended up making a F-Droid repository though, they said they were going to but the tweet seems to have been removed
Re:Trump's new platform and the Affero General Public Licens...
by kkjjkgjjgg on Saturday October 23, 2021 @07:48AM
(#28967545)
One of these days I'll have to look into that, to finally escape from Google :-/
Re:Trump's new platform and the Affero General Public Licens...
by Barrin92 on Friday October 22, 2021 @03:58PM
(#28961931)
>I am not sure why I need F-droid
i can only speak for myself but i'm always glad to support competition and open platforms and if they throw racists off their platform that's a plus for me
Many economic and software freedom related things wrong with proprietary stores or Google but that they deplatform reactionaries isn't one of them as far as i'm concerned
Re:Trump's new platform and the Affero General Public Licens...
by throwawaysea on Friday October 22, 2021 @10:39PM
(#28965196)
It seems you’re against people having a freedom to express themselves and exchange ideas. Historically denying this freedom accompanies authoritarian societies where propaganda and echo chambers make it seem like these actions are virtuous when they are actually not. Even the word “reactionary” is pejorative and was used widely in Soviet Russia and in China during the cultural revolution. Isn’t it better to let ideas be heard and debated even if controversial or disagreeable?