News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Original 1851 reviews of Moby-Dick by pkage on Friday October 22, 2021 @09:39AM (#28957055)
You're comparing highbrow literature reviews in leading magazines to short instant messages, which are a significantly different medium designed to be read by one or two people once, and then thrown away. Your best comparison is telegram style[0], which is not dissimilar to today's texts—complete with its own slang and shorthand. Nobody's writing "u up" in the New Yorker.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegram_style

Re:Original 1851 reviews of Moby-Dick by relaunched on Friday October 22, 2021 @09:46AM (#28957118)
I can't help but think that telegram style was more a function of the exorbitant cost and pricing model of sending a telegram.

https://newatlas.com/last-telegraph-message/28314/#:~:text=I....

Relative to wages in the 1860s, telegrams were very expensive.

https://www.portablepress.com/blog/2016/10/where-the-money-w...

Re:Original 1851 reviews of Moby-Dick by mwcampbell on Friday October 22, 2021 @12:23PM (#28959152)
Composing a text message on a touchscreen keyboard has its own cost. Not monetary, but still something to minimize.