News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Comparing ClickHouse to PostgreSQL and TimescaleDB for ti... by oddtodd on Friday October 22, 2021 @09:28AM (#28956943)
Last time I looked at TimescaleDB a few months ago, it appeared to me that you had to ingest data into what they call an access node, which made it a non-starter for our use case, but matched perfectly with ClickHouse, which is a symmetric deployment, where every node can be an ingest node.
Re:Comparing ClickHouse to PostgreSQL and TimescaleDB for ti... by ryanbooz on Friday October 22, 2021 @02:13PM (#28960576)
You are correct. The current multi-node deployment (if you need it for your workload) does have one "managing" access node. All ANs and DNs can be replicated and configured with tooling such as patroni for HA.

We have a few users that have larger multi-node clusters setup this way (one at 40+ nodes so far) and happy with the offering overall. Obviously YMMV depending on requirements/IT support.