Re:Stop Calling Everything AI, Machine-Learning Pioneer Says
by mathematically on Thursday October 21, 2021 @02:35PM
(#28949042)
So how do you get a value out of an LSTM?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Stop Calling Everything AI, Machine-Learning Pioneer Says
by IshKebab on Thursday October 21, 2021 @03:28PM
(#28949719)
Run it for as long as you want and look at the output state.
How do you the a value out of a person?
Re:Stop Calling Everything AI, Machine-Learning Pioneer Says
by mathematically on Thursday October 21, 2021 @03:44PM
(#28949903)
So then in the statement of the theorem the agent A can determine how many cycles the unit will run before halting, correct?
Re:Stop Calling Everything AI, Machine-Learning Pioneer Says
by drdeca on Thursday October 21, 2021 @08:56PM
(#28952631)
By determine do you mean predict or choose?
Re:Stop Calling Everything AI, Machine-Learning Pioneer Says
by mathematically on Friday October 22, 2021 @12:52AM
(#28953853)
I mean by looking at the source code for the neural network someone can give an upper bound on how many steps will be required before the entire network halts and gives an answer and they can prove that their upper bound is really an upper bound.
Re:Stop Calling Everything AI, Machine-Learning Pioneer Says
by IshKebab on Friday October 22, 2021 @04:30AM
(#28954873)
They need to know the input length too. With an infinite input it will never halt.
Re:Stop Calling Everything AI, Machine-Learning Pioneer Says
by mathematically on Friday October 22, 2021 @05:15AM
(#28955152)
Yes, that's the usual assumption when working with Turing machines and proofs. But I guess you could also allow infinite inputs and it wouldn't make that much difference, e.g. computing exp(x) for some real x as input.