Re:Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change...
by adamrezich on Thursday October 21, 2021 @01:45AM
(#28940787)
> Climate works on 30 year cycles.
without having any standing at all in the field, I can't imagine that such a simple, reductive statement could possibly be generally true about something as physically massive and chaotic and infinitely, fractally complex as the planet's climate.
Re:Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change...
by adamrezich on Thursday October 21, 2021 @10:46AM
(#28945239)
there's a huge difference between "Some scientists define climate as the average weather for a particular region and time period, usually taken over 30-years" and "climate works on 30 year cycles"
Re:Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change...
by zamalek on Thursday October 21, 2021 @07:24PM
(#28952054)
You are correct. Even with my flawed (sleep deprived) wording, the same conclusion exists: climate is an average, it is not weather
My argument stands.
Re:Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change...
by cryptoegorophy on Thursday October 21, 2021 @01:38AM
(#28940737)
There are cycles within cycles as well.
history of sea ice in the arctic
https://www.geo.umass.edu/faculty/jbg/Pubs/Polyak%20etal%20s...
https://www.livescience.com/siberian-wildfire-smoke-reaches-...