Re:COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lackin...
by AndrewBissell on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @07:42PM
(#28938334)
Yeah it definitely seems less risky than the mRNA/adenoviral-vector approach. I know a guy in the Phase 3 trials who had some really bad side effects from the shots, but they only lasted a day. Unfortunately now he's stuck because the mandates all require one of the authorized vaccines, and there's essentially no data on whether it would be safe for him to take one after Novavax.
Re:COVID vaccine injury claims mount, but recourse is lackin...
by tjr on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @07:46PM
(#28938364)
I have heard of companies accepting Novavax trial participants as meeting the mandate requirements. Might be worth asking.
Or if he is needing a booster shot... yeah, that's a little harder right now. I think some trial participants (in England?) were approved for taking a different vaccine as a booster, but if can possibly hold out, waiting for more Novavax seems to make more sense to me.
Agreed, I'm not sure of the value of continuing to target the original virus, but it sounds like Novavax offers decent protection against known variants also.
More interestingly, their vaccine directly exposes you to the spike protein, rather than telling your body to fabricate it.