News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by kaba0 on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @04:10AM (#28915917)
In case your statement is only a slight sarcasm:

Isn’t that just the OS saying “unused memory is wasted memory”? Most of it is likely cache that can easily be evicted with higher memory pressure.

Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by eyelidlessness on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @08:51PM (#28925568)
It’s a slight exaggeration, I also have an editor open and some dev process (test runner usually). It’s not just caching, I routinely hit >30 GB swap with fans revved to the max and fairly often this becomes unstable enough to require a reboot even after manually closing as much as I can.

I mean, some of this comes down to poor executive function on my part, failing to manage resources I’m no longer using. But that’s also a valid use case for me and I’m much more effective at whatever I’m doing if I can defer it with a larger memory capacity.

Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by kaba0 on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @04:29AM (#28928190)
Which OS do you use? It’s definitely not a problem on your part, the OS should be managing it completely transparently.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by kasabali on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @05:23AM (#28916297)
It is the OS saying “unused memory is wasted memory”, and then every other application thinking they're OS and doing the same.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by kaba0 on Tuesday October 19, 2021 @04:18PM (#28923213)
Since applications have virtual memory, it sort of doesn’t matter? The OS will map these to actual pages based on how many processes are available, etc. So if only one app runs and it wants lots of memory, it makes sense to give it lots of memory - that is the most “economical” decision from both a energy and performance POV.
Re:Apple’s new M1 Pro and M1 Max processors by kasabali on Wednesday October 20, 2021 @05:24AM (#28928570)
> So if only one app runs

You answered yourself.