News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U... by spywaregorilla on Monday October 18, 2021 @01:33PM (#28908142)
I think you're confusing "income" for "wealth". The wealthiest people are the people with the most assets. You don't pop into the top 10% just by selling a house. That doesn't affect your wealth at all.

The wealthiest do tend to be older because they've accrued wealth over a lifetime, but it's definitely not true that if you're old, you're wealthy.

Wealth is not income, and neither are class.

Re:The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U... by chmod600 on Monday October 18, 2021 @01:40PM (#28908235)
You're right that the "ebb and flow" on wealth is much less of a factor than on income, and that I conflated those two.

But not controlling for age is still a major omission. A lot of middle class people are in the top 10% as they near retirement because they've been saving throughout their life. How many? The article doesn't say.

Re:The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U... by ska on Monday October 18, 2021 @03:36PM (#28910481)
This does not seem to be true, at least by any numbers I could quickly find. Seems like median net worth for retired folks is under $250k, net worth for 90th percentile folks is 1.25mm.

If you restrict to 65-69 age group, the median only shifts to about 270k, 90th percentile is a little under 2mm.

To get to 1mm net worth at that age group, you have to go up to about the 80 percentile.

It seems you are correct that the 90 percentile shifts a fair bit at retirement age (65-69 is peak net worth) but it doesn't effect the middle very much, and you have to be > 20% to catch that 1.25mm number at any age group.

Re:The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U... by spywaregorilla on Monday October 18, 2021 @01:55PM (#28908502)
I don't think I agree. The article is not making generalizations about the wealthy. It's about the top 10% wealthiest and stating they own 90% of stocks.

If you wanted age normalized wealth, the top 10% would probably be a lot of rich kids whose peers have negative net worth. I'm sure that's an interesting cut, but it's a different topic.