News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why not “Why not WireGuard?” (2020). Parent comment

Re:Why not “Why not WireGuard?” (2020) by iso1210 on Sunday October 17, 2021 @02:13PM (#28898448)
I run wireguard servers on many ports, including 53, 443 and 5-figure numbers. I don't think I've got 5000 anywhere though.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why not “Why not WireGuard?” (2020) by 5e92cb50239222b on Sunday October 17, 2021 @03:03PM (#28898853)
Same. Not that it means much, but I've been seeing 51820 being used in all documentation, blog posts, etc. Probably just copypasting the original examples, e.g.

https://www.wireguard.com/quickstart/

https://www.wireguard.com/xplatform/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why not “Why not WireGuard?” (2020) by chupasaurus on Sunday October 17, 2021 @06:43PM (#28900436)
A month ago I dug through the history, the only trace to origin of using 51820/UDP I've found is that the number is hardcoded in one of the tests.
[ Parent | on HN ]