News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon asks Ring owners to respect privacy after court ru... by kolanos on Sunday October 17, 2021 @01:51PM (#28898273)
> The issue is he set it up without complying with GDPR rules. If you set up a CCTV system that can record public areas or land you don't own, the data collected needs to be reasonable and you need to notify people you're doing it so they can request to have images of them deleted. Any organisation running CCTV in a public area will likely have performed a DPIA, including police, local government etc.

On the GDPR front, I'm pretty sure Ring doorbell cameras store the videos in their cloud service. I would expect any GDPR implications to be primarily, if not solely, the responsibility of Ring/Amazon as they're the provider storing the data. Doesn't seem reasonable to make this the responsibility of every Ring doorbell camera user.

To be honest, I'm surprised Amazon isn't doing more here to defend this business owner.

Re:Amazon asks Ring owners to respect privacy after court ru... by detaro on Sunday October 17, 2021 @01:59PM (#28898337)
No, it's pretty obvious that the primary obligation is with the person making the decision about installing and using the camera. I doubt Amazon could entirely retreat on "we are a service provider with no clue what's being done" (given how it's a purpose-designed product), but the owner is going to be first in line either way.