News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California Scrambles to Find Electricity to Offset Plant ... by keneda7 on Saturday October 16, 2021 @11:41AM (#28888614)
IMO Wikipedia is a bias source for anything politics related. Heck the Wikipedia page for its confounder even mentions this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger#:~:text=In%20a%20....

I have found this site to be much more reliable when looking for media bias.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/

Re:California Scrambles to Find Electricity to Offset Plant ... by hairofadog on Saturday October 16, 2021 @11:53AM (#28888704)
I’m confused (sincerely, not concern trolling) about the point you’re making by linking to media bias fact check for NYT (which wasn’t being discussed) but not WSJ or Wikipedia.

According to the site you find reliable,

NYT: biased center left, factual reporting “high”

WSJ: biased on the right edge of center right, factual reporting “mostly factual”

Wikipedia: “least biased”, factual reporting “mixed”

Re:California Scrambles to Find Electricity to Offset Plant ... by keneda7 on Saturday October 16, 2021 @01:18PM (#28889447)
Nope you are correct. It was early and I misread it as NYT. That is my mistake
Re:California Scrambles to Find Electricity to Offset Plant ... by nend on Saturday October 16, 2021 @11:50AM (#28888677)
That website also says the WSJ has a right lean:

"Overall, we rate the Wall Street Journal Right-Center biased due to low biased news reporting combined with a strong right biased editorial stance."

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/wall-street-journal/

Re:California Scrambles to Find Electricity to Offset Plant ... by keneda7 on Saturday October 16, 2021 @01:18PM (#28889454)
Ya that is my mistake sorry it was early and somehow I misread WSJ as NYT.