Re:Louisville sawmill challenges perception about wages
by mattzito on Saturday October 16, 2021 @10:49AM
(#28888233)
You can’t call a conclusion a lie because you don’t agree with it. A lie implies falsehood, where you’re just saying, “I don’t agree that this situation where raising the minimum wage of a small towns core business didn’t have negative impacts can translate to a larger scope of a whole state, because I don’t believe that’s how it works”. It’s on you to show the opposite.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Louisville sawmill challenges perception about wages
by agent327 on Saturday October 16, 2021 @02:09PM
(#28889984)
So a conclusion that uses a false generalisation must be accepted at face value despite its faulty logic? This has nothing to do with opinion, mine or otherwise; the article is pushing a policy on the basis of broken logic. And yes, I can damn well call that a lie.