Re:Southwest new CEO denies walk-off rumors, defends pilots ...
by TeeMassive on Saturday October 16, 2021 @01:50AM
(#28885849)
Weather maps don't show unusual adverse weather conditions. Other didn't show apparent impact, even lesser. Face it, it's not the weather.
Re:Southwest new CEO denies walk-off rumors, defends pilots ...
by p_l on Sunday October 17, 2021 @04:28AM
(#28894884)
Because it was not just weather. It was combination of weather with low staffing of local ATC and disruptions to flight patterns. Weather is just one of the triggers.
Re:Southwest new CEO denies walk-off rumors, defends pilots ...
by TeeMassive on Sunday October 17, 2021 @01:28PM
(#28898107)
Which would have impacted heavily local airlines too, which didn't happen. Also again, weather maps do not lie.
Most low-cost airlines operate on a sort of "distributed hub-and-spoke" (many small hubs instead of one/few big ones), with plane going bidirectionally on a route to non-hub airport before any route switching happens. This means that so long as the "hub" isn't severely impacted your disruption is somewhat contained and you still have access to a fleet of planes&crews that can be reassigned. A pattern like this:
Disruption at A,B, or C doesn't block unrelated flights, only disruption at H.Southwest instead flies like this
If B is in any way blocked, flights B->C, C->D, D->E, E->F, and F->G are all going to be disrupted, possibly without replacements plane/crew combinations available. If the disrupted airport has a lot of overlapping "lines" like that, the disruption quickly turns catastrophical.Also, appears that at least some approaches were manually vectored recently at KJAX, which isn't fun if there's a shortage of controllers.