Re:Why “Trusting the Science” Is Complicated
by mcguire on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @04:47PM
(#28857521)
"I've read hundreds of papers on climate change. These topics never seem to come up. Rarely do climate scientists mention the sun, which seems to be treated like a static heat bulb in the sky that gives off an steady, constant flow of energy, which couldn't be further from the truth!"
These statements are contradictory.
"Modelling the impact of solar variability on climate" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S13646...)
"Climate change and solar variability: What's new under the sun?" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00128...)
"Significant impact of forcing uncertainty in a large ensemble of climate model simulations" (https://www.pnas.org/content/118/23/e2016549118.short)
"Has solar variability caused climate change that affected human culture?" (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S02731...)
"Do Models Underestimate the Solar Contribution to Recent Climate Change?" (https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/16/24/1520-0...)
Hell, Roy Spencer has made much of his career off blaming what climate change he admits exists on solar variability.