News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What if performance advertising is just an analytics scam? by hn_throwaway_99 on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @02:37PM (#28855725)
I do the same, but 99% of people do not, so it's really a drop in the bucket.

I do wish there were some regulation such that if a user is searching for a trademarked or copyrighted term, that the best organic search result for that term should be required to show up first. I'm fine with showing competitor ads, but I don't think they should be able to show up above the trademark owner's ads.

Re:What if performance advertising is just an analytics scam? by verve_rat on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @04:16PM (#28857113)
It feels like it is close (but not really) to a trademark violation. If I search for "A" and get a screen full of results for "B", if I need to scroll to even see mentions of "A", then that feels like it is really close to "passing off". I could see an argument for saying that this "passing off" causes customer confusion that requires trademark enforcement.

I realise that would probably be an impossible argument to win under current law (IANAL), but it _feels_ so very close.

Re:What if performance advertising is just an analytics scam? by GeneralMayhem on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @10:48PM (#28860003)
US case law is extremely clear that bidding on and running ads on trademarked keywords is not a trademark violation, so long as you aren't misrepresenting that the replacement is the trademarked thing; see e.g. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/litigation/committees/bus....
Re:What if performance advertising is just an analytics scam? by figassis on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @03:21PM (#28856295)
And would be trivial for google, with all their content id tech