News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why “Trusting the Science” Is Complicated by marcosdumay on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @02:05PM (#28855405)
Well, bewaring human institutions is a universal lesson that more institutions should teach. That you got that lesson there only means that you got at least one good teacher.

That said, religion is based on the idea of worshiping a core idea, that shouldn't be contested, while science is based on the idea of contesting your core ideas, and never accepting pure belief. They are similar on the way that opposite things always have some similarity.

(Anyway, "the scientific method is perfect" is a very bad misquote of the OP. Believing your method is perfect is anti-scientific, you should be always on the hunt for a better method.)

Re:Why “Trusting the Science” Is Complicated by marivilla on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @02:51PM (#28855888)
>"the scientific method is perfect" is a very bad misquote of the OP

:o

It's not a misquote, the comment I replied to really said that!

Re:Why “Trusting the Science” Is Complicated by marcosdumay on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @03:51PM (#28856761)
It's not your misquote.

But the original is "the scientific method is anti-fragile, The harder you attack it, the sturdier it becomes." The comment you replied to threw a lot of nuance away when it was replaced by "perfect", and you threw the context that kept it reasonable away when you decided to compare with a similar phrase from anpother context. So, you both together made a misquote.