Re:AI predicts accident hot-spots from satellite imagery and...
by ghaff on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @11:25AM
(#28853371)
And carpet bombing traffic lights everywhere isn't really an answer even aside from cost. When some new retail went in near me, a bunch of traffic lights were added. To be clear, the adjacent interstate exchange was a really lousy intersection at busy times of the day. But the mass of street lights now make a straight shot through the intersections about a 5-10 minute process to go maybe a quarter mile.
Re:AI predicts accident hot-spots from satellite imagery and...
by throwaway0a5e on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @11:40AM
(#28853586)
>But the mass of street lights now make a straight shot through the intersections about a 5-10 minute process to go maybe a quarter mile.
I'm sure all sorts of wonderful pedestrian friendly moves get pulled by people trying to get ahead in that game.
Re:AI predicts accident hot-spots from satellite imagery and...
by ghaff on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @11:47AM
(#28853697)
There are essentially no pedestrians there (and no explicit pedestrian crossing). It's basically the boundary between a mostly rural exurb and a small city's sprawl. What it does have is one of those stupid zipper merges immediately after a traffic light which encourages aggressive drivers to jump the merge queue on a regular basis even if it means effectively running someone off the road.
Re:AI predicts accident hot-spots from satellite imagery and...
by Symbiote on Wednesday October 13, 2021 @11:20AM
(#28853294)
I highly recommend the linked video (posted just above). It is not a natural law that pedestrians die on streets/roads, but it is a result of this typical North American road design.
These roads aren't ideal but they're everywhere because they're cheap. Unless you can wave a magic wand and make municipalities rich enough to carpet bomb everything with traffic lights, dedicated turn lanes and sidewalks there are going to be tradeoffs.