Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by jhgb on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @03:39PM
(#28844124)
> the other half is radiated away as hard to capture neutrons, which are almost entirely a waste product
I thought the neutrons were supposed to take away the heat, to be absorbed in layers of water?
Re:Major nuclear fusion milestone reached as ‘ignition’ trig...
by tsimionescu on Tuesday October 12, 2021 @03:55PM
(#28844297)
Reading more about this, it seems that one of the ideas is indeed to capture the neutrons in a liquid lithium blanket, that would then produce both heat and tritium, and using that heat, that is outside the magnetic confinement, to connect to a turbine.
Unfortunately, I believe that the area of actually capturing the energy of the fusion reaction is almost entirely unstudied yet in practice.
This is dead wrong. First of all, the experiment described here is ICF, in which you have to constantly re-heat new pellets of fuel. Even for MCF, you have to spend inordinate amounts of energy just containing the million kelvins plasma with few kelvin superconducting magnets, and to constantly deliver new D+T into the plasma.
If containment fails at any time for any amount of time, your reactor is instantly obliterated.
Not to mention, your source of heat only heats up by about half of the energy - the other half is radiated away as hard to capture neutrons, which are almost entirely a waste product.
I have no idea why you think that ignited plasma is enough to maintain an energy-producing reactor.
Edit: million kelvins should have been billion kelvins...