> Because nuclear is the only one with multigenerational risks that can make entire regions inhabitable.

I'm glad to know climate change will be a solved problem for my children.

> Hiding waste is not a viable solution to dealing with it

Why? Is just dropping it in the atmosphere better?

> and you came safely use the land underneath for farming or other uses.

Not really. There are safety margins, noise regulations, concrete platforms, electrical connections, ...

> Not to mention the ecological devastation related to ruining a square mile of land permanently for centuries

They don't remove the foundations either when windmills are done.

> I said solar.

So the energy for which you would require dozens of millions of square mils of surface, a cleaning system to prevent them to lose 30% of their efficiency in a year, whose construction process is incredibly polluant, and that doesn't work for half a year in half of the world? That sounds like a great large-scale solution.