Re:Tesla Model Y matrix LEDs, structural battery unveiled at...
by baybal2 on Sunday October 10, 2021 @04:26PM
(#28821661)
> I think the biggest consideration here is the fire / electrical risk of a slightly damaged or questionably compromised battery pack (structural or otherwise).
Indeed, and it's very precarious lack of any fusing, and other safety measures inside the Tesla battery pack besides fusible cell leads.
I believe most other saner EV makers will surely adddress this, if they didn't do so already.
Alternatively, BYD got very well positioned here with its own structural battery.
LFP cells are safe enough that they even use them as a crumple zone to dissipate crash energy.
This allows them to save weight even more on battery structure, as they don't have to protect it at all costs.
Having an effectively "free" crumple zone is a huge weight saver.
I think the biggest consideration here is the fire / electrical risk of a slightly damaged or questionably compromised battery pack (structural or otherwise). In time, insurance companies / providers will likely adjust their actuarial math to compensate for battery risks or more generally long term risks of post-accident Ev's. It'll be interesting to see how the buy back numbers look - a structural battery might actually leave more cells / components intact for re-sale / scrapping or recycling in comparison to ICE vehicles which are generally just priced for their scrap value by weight.
Again, I'll never buy a tesla - I'm driving my ICE VW GTI with a manual transmission into the ground.