Re:Canada's 'gamble' on delaying, mixing and matching Covid-...
by _AzMoo on Sunday October 10, 2021 @08:06AM
(#28817763)
That's exactly what Australia did, except all of the FUD led to older Australians choosing to forgo AZ due to the perceived risk.
Re:Canada's 'gamble' on delaying, mixing and matching Covid-...
by orra on Sunday October 10, 2021 @09:15AM
(#28818178)
Ah, didn't realise. Good they didn't ban it, but then that's still a clear failure of public health messaging. In exchange for falling behind on vaccination, Australia had some rather strict lockdowns (especially for the post-vaccine stage of the pandemic).
Re:Canada's 'gamble' on delaying, mixing and matching Covid-...
by jeeeb on Sunday October 10, 2021 @04:17PM
(#28821604)
I’m in my 30s and had AZ. It certainly wasn’t banned.
Until recently it was the only vaccine available for over 60s even.
Also FWIW. The risk of blood clots seems to be significantly higher in women than men. I think they should have focused on giving AZ to men and Pfizer to younger women.
For a while though some states were giving Pfizer to men in their 40s and 50s working from home, while recommending young women go and get dosed with AZ.
Blood clot risk is much higher the younger you are[1]. It would have been far better to continue using AstraZeneca, but limit it to a certain age and older.
[1] For example, 1.1 of the specific clots per 100 000 vaccinations of people in their 20s, falling to 0.2 per 100 000 in their 60s. https://wintoncentre.maths.cam.ac.uk/news/communicating-pote...