Yeah, I am aware that he was using the words in that context. I was using his words as a platform based on the tautological relevance. I sought to indicate that long-standing corruption can't be excused by ignorance in terms of awareness, because it really portends an ignorance that is borne of actively ignoring important matters, and at the heart of the matter ignorance is about ignoring things. There's a time where it's reasonable to say nothing has been done because most people are ignorant, i.e., not aware, but the FCC has been this way for 30+ years.