Re:SpaceX hits $100B valuation after secondary share sale
by rotexo on Friday October 08, 2021 @12:47PM
(#28801263)
I find myself excited about starship for other reasons. It seems like there is a large range of outcomes for the starship development program—maybe the difficulty of having an effective, durable, and serviceable heat shield really will kill the fully-and-rapidly-reusable goal. Even in that case, though, a stripped-down stainless steel upper stage could reduce the costs of access to Earth orbit such that space-based solar power or sunshades to buy us time to reduce greenhouse gas emissions become feasible, even if the dreams of humans in space/on the moon and Mars colonization don’t pan out (I’m skeptical of the value of those human space presence goals anyways).
Edit: I have no idea if the more modest capabilities of starship/super heavy justify the current valuation, but they at least seem like they would be useful capabilities to maintain.
Re:SpaceX hits $100B valuation after secondary share sale
by cfcosta on Friday October 08, 2021 @01:08PM
(#28801505)
True. Another thing that I keep thinking is that currently the first stages of the rockets are not reusable. Even if they have to build a new starship per flight, they can just reuse the boosters and still be miles ahead of anyone else, with a Saturn V sized rocket ready to launch.
Plus they can expand the real state in the ISS much cheaper by just docking and leaving it there.
Think space stations, lunar outposts, mining and manufacturing.