Re:Underdog Devs: supporting formerly incarcerated and disad...
by not2b on Thursday October 07, 2021 @07:07PM
(#28793292)
The short answer is yes, the bar for a developer is much, much lower than for a lawyer, a doctor, or an accountant, requiring much less training. Doesn't mean that there aren't some forms of development that require considerable skill and experience, but many positions just don't.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Underdog Devs: supporting formerly incarcerated and disad...
by symlinkk on Thursday October 07, 2021 @07:26PM
(#28793474)
The bar is lower because we don’t have formal testing like they do, e.g. the bar exam or med school.
Re:Underdog Devs: supporting formerly incarcerated and disad...
by not2b on Thursday October 07, 2021 @08:45PM
(#28794219)
So, would you require someone to get formal testing before they can code a website for someone for pay? Why?
Re:Underdog Devs: supporting formerly incarcerated and disad...
by cbpowell on Thursday October 07, 2021 @11:49PM
(#28795546)
You have heard of the tech interview process, yes? :-)
Re:Underdog Devs: supporting formerly incarcerated and disad...
by symlinkk on Thursday October 07, 2021 @10:51PM
(#28795197)
Possibly. It could prove that a dev knows what they’re doing. It might even eliminate the need for Leetcode style interview questions.
Re:Underdog Devs: supporting formerly incarcerated and disad...
by makeitdouble on Friday October 08, 2021 @12:32AM
(#28795770)
The parent mentioned regulated professions, but there is a flurry of roles surrounding lawyers, nurses and accountants that don't require certification.
Now, I'm sure there are programs to try to help ex-convicts to get into generic company roles like assistants, data operators etc.