Louder with Crowder? Really?

Well he certainly is familiar with bias. I'll give you that.

So... nothing to refute? Just don't like the guy?

Post a link to content posted by someone who isn't a bully and a homophobe and I'll look at it. Crowder is a cut-rate Rush Limbaugh without the gravitas and he has the same approach.

I don't have any opinion about him as a person but as a source of information he isn't reputable and I'd not waste my time listening to him.

Is it not what is said a concern for you rather who is saying it?

Your comment on why you’re not viewing it:

> someone who isn't a bully and a homophobe

Your explanation of your own comment:

> I don't have any opinion about him as a person […] as a source of information he isn't reputable

I think at some level, you recognize that you’re ignoring a source based on your opinion of him as a person, so you feel the need to claim the opposite.

You’d think if your second paragraph were true, you’d have commented on his failures as a source and not him as a person as the basis of your objection in the first paragraph.

>Post a link to content posted by someone who isn't a bully and a homophobe and I'll look at it.

That's.. Not coherent. GP didn't ask you to look, you volunteered that you don't want to look.