News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mono: A cure for Microsoft monotheism by rbanffy on Friday August 12, 2011 @01:12PM (#2878146)
Every Visual Studio for Mac license sold means one less Windows license sold. If they make the transition away from Windows easy, less corporations would want to enter corporate licenses. Mac users would consider using iWork instead of Office. That move would, ultimately, erode Microsoft's market dominance, then their share and the slide into one-more-competitor condition would be inevitable.

If they ever do that, it'll be because they think Macs and other OSs don't represent a threat to other Microsoft software.

Re:Mono: A cure for Microsoft monotheism by thebandrews on Friday August 12, 2011 @03:04PM (#2878744)
Are you sure this is the reason? Our company uses Microsoft OS and office tools across the board. But when it comes to development most of our work is done in linux. A version of Visual Studio for Mac would make no difference.
Re:Mono: A cure for Microsoft monotheism by rbanffy on Friday August 12, 2011 @08:43PM (#2879844)
Your company seems to be very atypical. At least here in Brazil, most people who used to develop in Visual Basic for Windows have moved to ASP and then to ASP.NET for web applications. Of those who felt tempted to use Java, many moved to C#, which is very Java-ish.

Not all corporate developers are good developers. Managing good developers is hard and managers prefer the more predictable, cheaper, average ones. Sadly.

Re:Mono: A cure for Microsoft monotheism by MatthewPhillips on Friday August 12, 2011 @01:15PM (#2878161)
My point was that they already do it through Mac Office.
Re:Mono: A cure for Microsoft monotheism by rbanffy on Friday August 12, 2011 @01:23PM (#2878197)
Mac Office exists to prevent corporate Mac users from introducing competing office products. The only reason it's good is iWork.