Re:We moved from Pony to Rust
by mcintyre1994 on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @05:21PM
(#28778607)
It sounds like no other technology (including Rust 1.0) met their performance and concurrency requirements at the time though.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Surely there was C++ and Java.
C++ and Java did exist, and rejected for the following reasons:
"Furthermore, the existing Apache tools depended on Java - specifically the JVM - where it's really hard to get predictable, very low latency results."
"From a purely performance perspective, C or C++ would have been a good choice. However, from past experience we knew that building highly distributed data processing applications in C/C++ was no easy task. We ruled out C++ because we wanted better safety guarantees around memory and concurrency."