News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics by implements on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @04:37AM (#28770604)
So we would need 367 unique date identifiers … but we’ve only got 366 (Feb 29th being the non-annual one).

I get I may be being unintelligent, but isn’t the author confusing the rolling coin paradox with an obscure astronomical reference system and coming up with a ‘mistakenly technically correct’ result that doesn’t match experienced reality?

Re:Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics by mmmmmbop on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @07:38AM (#28771858)
Imagine you're standing on a set point on the surface on the outer coin, e.g. the one touching the inner coin. As the outer coin rotates around the inner coin, your experienced reality will be that you see n-1 rotations.

In the example of the outer coin having 1/3 the radius of the inner coin, as the outer coin rolls around the inner coin 4 times, you would actually only touch the inner coin 3 times.

Re:Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics by python273 on Thursday October 07, 2021 @02:44AM (#28783002)
I made a visualization for

> Circle A has 1/3 the radius of circle B, and circle A rolls one trip around circle B. How many times will circle A revolve in total?

https://www.shadertoy.com/view/7ddSR2

Re:Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics by rawling on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @06:37AM (#28771411)
It matches experienced reality if you look at the stars rather than the sun, or if you use something like a Foucault pendulum to measure the rotation speed.
Re:Conterintuitive facts in mathematics, CS, and physics by kgwgk on Wednesday October 06, 2021 @06:28AM (#28771351)
Why 367 dates?

Dates are not used to count Earth revolutions. They are counting days/nights and there are only a bit more that 365 of those in one year.