News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by cwjohnston on Thursday August 11, 2011 @06:49PM (#2875163)
Looks interesting. It's always been pretty amazing to me that a system like RVM remains so popular when it depends on overriding the operation of basic commands like 'cd'.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by sanderjd on Thursday August 11, 2011 @07:21PM (#2875270)
Yeah it's a really interesting demonstration of something that is just so darn useful that you're crazy not to use it (on your development machine), regardless of your complaints with it.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by mhansen on Thursday August 11, 2011 @09:26PM (#2875579)
That's the main reason I'm not using RVM. I depend on `cd` to work, every time, rock solid, especially when my system is unstable. I can't risk having a dependency or bug in their `cd` script breaking my most commonly used shell command.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by hadis on Friday August 12, 2011 @10:12AM (#2877292)
So then what did you use on your development machine to test your ruby apps with till now? What did you use if not RVM? I am happy that RVM exists and made my life as ruby developer much easier even if it overrides 'cd'. Also to note i never had problems with RVM. Your main reason not using RVM is poor, as if there were more options out there till now.
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by boz666 on Tuesday August 16, 2011 @07:15PM (#2893298)
.bash_profile? How hard is that?

ruby==ruby 1.8.7 ruby9==ruby 1.9.2 jruby== jruby 1.6 jruby5==jruby 1.5

Yeah, real tough.

Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by aneil on Saturday August 13, 2011 @10:21AM (#2880994)
Agree - this seems like an invitation to problems. Are there any known issues with it?
Re:Rbenv, an unobtrusive rvm replacement by syncsynchalt on Thursday August 11, 2011 @06:51PM (#2875173)